GamerWolf98 wrote:

Forestwave wrote:

GamerWolf98 wrote:

Forestwave wrote:

GamerWolf98 wrote:

lilredrose wrote:

lilredrose wrote:

Ok so I just watched game theory and Scott was fallowing in on it and gave some clues and by how close they got. So far they said that due to the pictures of Scott and his family in the forth game and one with his two sons and since Scott is the voice actor for phone guy and in the forth game there are two brothers. So the crying boy in the forth game might be his son along with his brother with the foxy head on. So bla bla bla the reason they are there at Freddy's all the time is because their dad(Scott) works there. And there's a waste egg where it shows purple guy putting a suit on a employee. And the hint that Scott dropped was something like what is seen by a child may be interpreted in a different way. Or something like that sorry it's been a while. So I think once the crying child saw that he thought purple guy had been stuffing him into that suit and told his brother about it. And finally we get out side where a girl has toys of the toy animatronics but chicas beak is off just like in the game when she moves. So it's not that this happened in different time periods but that it happened in the same time but with sister locations. Also if you activate the TV Easter egg it says 1983 not 87 so as we all now know the bite was in 83 but in the first game it says 87. Now wait how can that be if phone guy says it WAS 1987? Well it might have to do with him not remembering it right and Made a mistake. So any way. Back to the bite of 83 since the brother and his friends caused the crying brother to be bit the brother is having regrets and nightmares after he goes to each location his dad works at and he now beloved that the animatronics stuff you into suits. And when something says the famous catchphrase ITS ME. It's the brother still being haunted by what he and his friends had done. and for the missing children. I think those where his friends but the last time he saw them was at Fredbears pizzeria with the purple guy. And he didn't see them again so his nightmares are saying that the purple guy killed them. So in conclusion all the games we played where actully a child's night mare and we are bing told about them in a way of a story. And that's what the box is concealing the story that we are being told with an ending we don't want to except. So what do you guys think?

Sorry for the spelling or word mistakes I was writing this on a phone.

Wait… let me get this straight… you're saying that the FNAF games, FNAF 1, 2, 3, and 4 are all NIGHTMARES a kid had? Sorry it's just not clicking all the way yet…

WAIT!..WHATTTTTTTT? really?? wow!

^ What I was thinking when I first read that theory… XD

WHEW! CANNOT PROCESS!! RAHH HOW DID….? But how are you like…. playing the game then…. how would.. you.. die or survive? ( do you all think that Mangle was just like that in the dream? Hmm….

Well think about it… at 6:00 in the morning, the animatronics have to ‘leave you alone’, even if they're in the middle of jumpscaring. That is like a dream, like when you wake up from a nightmare at its climax… perhaps 6:00 is when the kid always wakes up. Also, if its a nightmare, then its not the kids fault that you always return… no wonder you return to work at nightshift every time despite all the creepy animatronics… you can't help it! It's all a nightmare!

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

I mean, show it. I mean, it's too….. OBVIOUS to be the bite of 87. It's just… right there….. It doesn't make sense. Also, in FNAF3, Phone Guy says that there was an unfortunate incident in a sister location, meaning most or all of the locations had the springlock suits. Also, what other reason would have the first restaurant been left to rot? Also, when the kid's head is bitten, that was the child's head being CRUSHED, not really bitten.

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

I mean, show it. I mean, it's too….. OBVIOUS to be the bite of 87. It's just… right there….. It doesn't make sense. Also, in FNAF3, Phone Guy says that there was an unfortunate incident in a sister location, meaning most or all of the locations had the springlock suits. Also, what other reason would have the first restaurant been left to rot? Also, when the kid's head is bitten, that was the child's head being CRUSHED, not really bitten.

Scott outright said the characters were haunted in a comment and outright showed the Puppet putting the kids' souls in the animatronics. Not everything has to be NOT obvious. Most, you literally just said it. And we don't really know about the withered location, so that's why. Finally, bite and crush aren't any different in this situation. They just CALLED it the bite of 87.

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

I mean, show it. I mean, it's too….. OBVIOUS to be the bite of 87. It's just… right there….. It doesn't make sense. Also, in FNAF3, Phone Guy says that there was an unfortunate incident in a sister location, meaning most or all of the locations had the springlock suits. Also, what other reason would have the first restaurant been left to rot? Also, when the kid's head is bitten, that was the child's head being CRUSHED, not really bitten.

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

I mean, show it. I mean, it's too….. OBVIOUS to be the bite of 87. It's just… right there….. It doesn't make sense. Also, in FNAF3, Phone Guy says that there was an unfortunate incident in a sister location, meaning most or all of the locations had the springlock suits. Also, what other reason would have the first restaurant been left to rot? Also, when the kid's head is bitten, that was the child's head being CRUSHED, not really bitten.

Scott outright said the characters were haunted in a comment and outright showed the Puppet putting the kids' souls in the animatronics. Not everything has to be NOT obvious. Most, you literally just said it. And we don't really know about the withered location, so that's why. Finally, bite and crush aren't any different in this situation. They just CALLED it the bite of 87.

YOU KNOW WHAT, why don't you just GO to the website, and try asking. REALLY. Saying it's haunted is exactly specific (Haunted by what?) and is VERY obvious anyways. With the Marionette, it's most likely the kids from the Missing Children Incident, but what if it's something different somehow? Also, thats saying that the events from the minigames with Purple/Pink Guy in them happen at the SAME TIME as FNAF2, as Purple Guy is in FNAF4, even if only as an Easter Egg.

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

I mean, show it. I mean, it's too….. OBVIOUS to be the bite of 87. It's just… right there….. It doesn't make sense. Also, in FNAF3, Phone Guy says that there was an unfortunate incident in a sister location, meaning most or all of the locations had the springlock suits. Also, what other reason would have the first restaurant been left to rot? Also, when the kid's head is bitten, that was the child's head being CRUSHED, not really bitten.

Scott outright said the characters were haunted in a comment and outright showed the Puppet putting the kids' souls in the animatronics. Not everything has to be NOT obvious. Most, you literally just said it. And we don't really know about the withered location, so that's why. Finally, bite and crush aren't any different in this situation. They just CALLED it the bite of 87.

YOU KNOW WHAT, why don't you just GO to the website, and try asking. REALLY. Saying it's haunted is exactly specific (Haunted by what?) and is VERY obvious anyways. With the Marionette, it's most likely the kids from the Missing Children Incident, but what if it's something different somehow? Also, thats saying that the events from the minigames with Purple/Pink Guy in them happen at the SAME TIME as FNAF2, as Purple Guy is in FNAF4, even if only as an Easter Egg.

Why the harshness? I could literally say the same thing to you, so it isn't really a counter. My point was not everything isn't obvious. (His name is the Puppet) The Puppet minigame shows the original 5 kids being put into the animatronics. And why can't Purple Guy be at two locations?

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

I mean, show it. I mean, it's too….. OBVIOUS to be the bite of 87. It's just… right there….. It doesn't make sense. Also, in FNAF3, Phone Guy says that there was an unfortunate incident in a sister location, meaning most or all of the locations had the springlock suits. Also, what other reason would have the first restaurant been left to rot? Also, when the kid's head is bitten, that was the child's head being CRUSHED, not really bitten.

Scott outright said the characters were haunted in a comment and outright showed the Puppet putting the kids' souls in the animatronics. Not everything has to be NOT obvious. Most, you literally just said it. And we don't really know about the withered location, so that's why. Finally, bite and crush aren't any different in this situation. They just CALLED it the bite of 87.

YOU KNOW WHAT, why don't you just GO to the website, and try asking. REALLY. Saying it's haunted is exactly specific (Haunted by what?) and is VERY obvious anyways. With the Marionette, it's most likely the kids from the Missing Children Incident, but what if it's something different somehow? Also, thats saying that the events from the minigames with Purple/Pink Guy in them happen at the SAME TIME as FNAF2, as Purple Guy is in FNAF4, even if only as an Easter Egg.

Why the harshness? I could literally say the same thing to you, so it isn't really a counter. My point was not everything isn't obvious. (His name is the Puppet) The Puppet minigame shows the original 5 kids being put into the animatronics. And why can't Purple Guy be at two locations?

The puppet is also called the Marionette, which is proven by his Nightmare form name being Nightmarionette/Nightmarione. Also, I'm starting to get upset XD (( Which should be expected from a girl with anger issues LOL )). Also, I don't see why he would, as he would have to travel a lot, as I doubt the locations would be that near each other.

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

I mean, show it. I mean, it's too….. OBVIOUS to be the bite of 87. It's just… right there….. It doesn't make sense. Also, in FNAF3, Phone Guy says that there was an unfortunate incident in a sister location, meaning most or all of the locations had the springlock suits. Also, what other reason would have the first restaurant been left to rot? Also, when the kid's head is bitten, that was the child's head being CRUSHED, not really bitten.

Scott outright said the characters were haunted in a comment and outright showed the Puppet putting the kids' souls in the animatronics. Not everything has to be NOT obvious. Most, you literally just said it. And we don't really know about the withered location, so that's why. Finally, bite and crush aren't any different in this situation. They just CALLED it the bite of 87.

YOU KNOW WHAT, why don't you just GO to the website, and try asking. REALLY. Saying it's haunted is exactly specific (Haunted by what?) and is VERY obvious anyways. With the Marionette, it's most likely the kids from the Missing Children Incident, but what if it's something different somehow? Also, thats saying that the events from the minigames with Purple/Pink Guy in them happen at the SAME TIME as FNAF2, as Purple Guy is in FNAF4, even if only as an Easter Egg.

Why the harshness? I could literally say the same thing to you, so it isn't really a counter. My point was not everything isn't obvious. (His name is the Puppet) The Puppet minigame shows the original 5 kids being put into the animatronics. And why can't Purple Guy be at two locations?

The puppet is also called the Marionette, which is proven by his Nightmare form name being Nightmarionette/Nightmarione. Also, I'm starting to get upset XD (( Which should be expected from a girl with anger issues LOL )). Also, I don't see why he would, as he would have to travel a lot, as I doubt the locations would be that near each other.

Nightwing412 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

I mean, show it. I mean, it's too….. OBVIOUS to be the bite of 87. It's just… right there….. It doesn't make sense. Also, in FNAF3, Phone Guy says that there was an unfortunate incident in a sister location, meaning most or all of the locations had the springlock suits. Also, what other reason would have the first restaurant been left to rot? Also, when the kid's head is bitten, that was the child's head being CRUSHED, not really bitten.

Scott outright said the characters were haunted in a comment and outright showed the Puppet putting the kids' souls in the animatronics. Not everything has to be NOT obvious. Most, you literally just said it. And we don't really know about the withered location, so that's why. Finally, bite and crush aren't any different in this situation. They just CALLED it the bite of 87.

YOU KNOW WHAT, why don't you just GO to the website, and try asking. REALLY. Saying it's haunted is exactly specific (Haunted by what?) and is VERY obvious anyways. With the Marionette, it's most likely the kids from the Missing Children Incident, but what if it's something different somehow? Also, thats saying that the events from the minigames with Purple/Pink Guy in them happen at the SAME TIME as FNAF2, as Purple Guy is in FNAF4, even if only as an Easter Egg.

Why the harshness? I could literally say the same thing to you, so it isn't really a counter. My point was not everything isn't obvious. (His name is the Puppet) The Puppet minigame shows the original 5 kids being put into the animatronics. And why can't Purple Guy be at two locations?

The puppet is also called the Marionette, which is proven by his Nightmare form name being Nightmarionette/Nightmarione. Also, I'm starting to get upset XD (( Which should be expected from a girl with anger issues LOL )). Also, I don't see why he would, as he would have to travel a lot, as I doubt the locations would be that near each other.

ALso, I couldn't go to the website, because I'm only 12 and I would have to make an account most likely, and my only Google accounts are school ones.

Nightwing412 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

I mean, show it. I mean, it's too….. OBVIOUS to be the bite of 87. It's just… right there….. It doesn't make sense. Also, in FNAF3, Phone Guy says that there was an unfortunate incident in a sister location, meaning most or all of the locations had the springlock suits. Also, what other reason would have the first restaurant been left to rot? Also, when the kid's head is bitten, that was the child's head being CRUSHED, not really bitten.

Scott outright said the characters were haunted in a comment and outright showed the Puppet putting the kids' souls in the animatronics. Not everything has to be NOT obvious. Most, you literally just said it. And we don't really know about the withered location, so that's why. Finally, bite and crush aren't any different in this situation. They just CALLED it the bite of 87.

YOU KNOW WHAT, why don't you just GO to the website, and try asking. REALLY. Saying it's haunted is exactly specific (Haunted by what?) and is VERY obvious anyways. With the Marionette, it's most likely the kids from the Missing Children Incident, but what if it's something different somehow? Also, thats saying that the events from the minigames with Purple/Pink Guy in them happen at the SAME TIME as FNAF2, as Purple Guy is in FNAF4, even if only as an Easter Egg.

Why the harshness? I could literally say the same thing to you, so it isn't really a counter. My point was not everything isn't obvious. (His name is the Puppet) The Puppet minigame shows the original 5 kids being put into the animatronics. And why can't Purple Guy be at two locations?

The puppet is also called the Marionette, which is proven by his Nightmare form name being Nightmarionette/Nightmarione. Also, I'm starting to get upset XD (( Which should be expected from a girl with anger issues LOL )). Also, I don't see why he would, as he would have to travel a lot, as I doubt the locations would be that near each other.

ALso, I couldn't go to the website, because I'm only 12 and I would have to make an account most likely, and my only Google accounts are school ones.

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

I mean, show it. I mean, it's too….. OBVIOUS to be the bite of 87. It's just… right there….. It doesn't make sense. Also, in FNAF3, Phone Guy says that there was an unfortunate incident in a sister location, meaning most or all of the locations had the springlock suits. Also, what other reason would have the first restaurant been left to rot? Also, when the kid's head is bitten, that was the child's head being CRUSHED, not really bitten.

Scott outright said the characters were haunted in a comment and outright showed the Puppet putting the kids' souls in the animatronics. Not everything has to be NOT obvious. Most, you literally just said it. And we don't really know about the withered location, so that's why. Finally, bite and crush aren't any different in this situation. They just CALLED it the bite of 87.

YOU KNOW WHAT, why don't you just GO to the website, and try asking. REALLY. Saying it's haunted is exactly specific (Haunted by what?) and is VERY obvious anyways. With the Marionette, it's most likely the kids from the Missing Children Incident, but what if it's something different somehow? Also, thats saying that the events from the minigames with Purple/Pink Guy in them happen at the SAME TIME as FNAF2, as Purple Guy is in FNAF4, even if only as an Easter Egg.

Why the harshness? I could literally say the same thing to you, so it isn't really a counter. My point was not everything isn't obvious. (His name is the Puppet) The Puppet minigame shows the original 5 kids being put into the animatronics. And why can't Purple Guy be at two locations?

The puppet is also called the Marionette, which is proven by his Nightmare form name being Nightmarionette/Nightmarione. Also, I'm starting to get upset XD (( Which should be expected from a girl with anger issues LOL )). Also, I don't see why he would, as he would have to travel a lot, as I doubt the locations would be that near each other.

ALso, I couldn't go to the website, because I'm only 12 and I would have to make an account most likely, and my only Google accounts are school ones.

What website are you talking about?

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

I mean, show it. I mean, it's too….. OBVIOUS to be the bite of 87. It's just… right there….. It doesn't make sense. Also, in FNAF3, Phone Guy says that there was an unfortunate incident in a sister location, meaning most or all of the locations had the springlock suits. Also, what other reason would have the first restaurant been left to rot? Also, when the kid's head is bitten, that was the child's head being CRUSHED, not really bitten.

Scott outright said the characters were haunted in a comment and outright showed the Puppet putting the kids' souls in the animatronics. Not everything has to be NOT obvious. Most, you literally just said it. And we don't really know about the withered location, so that's why. Finally, bite and crush aren't any different in this situation. They just CALLED it the bite of 87.

YOU KNOW WHAT, why don't you just GO to the website, and try asking. REALLY. Saying it's haunted is exactly specific (Haunted by what?) and is VERY obvious anyways. With the Marionette, it's most likely the kids from the Missing Children Incident, but what if it's something different somehow? Also, thats saying that the events from the minigames with Purple/Pink Guy in them happen at the SAME TIME as FNAF2, as Purple Guy is in FNAF4, even if only as an Easter Egg.

Why the harshness? I could literally say the same thing to you, so it isn't really a counter. My point was not everything isn't obvious. (His name is the Puppet) The Puppet minigame shows the original 5 kids being put into the animatronics. And why can't Purple Guy be at two locations?

The puppet is also called the Marionette, which is proven by his Nightmare form name being Nightmarionette/Nightmarione. Also, I'm starting to get upset XD (( Which should be expected from a girl with anger issues LOL )). Also, I don't see why he would, as he would have to travel a lot, as I doubt the locations would be that near each other.

Okay, just don't get where the anger came from. In fnaf 3 he is called “Phantom Puppet”. The name “Puppet” is canon because Nightmarione is in the non-canon Halloween update. This might be a stretch, but we don't really know if Purple Guy works at fnaf 2.

Forestwave wrote:

What I don't get is why his name is Purple Guy? And the locations would have to be pretty far away….
But in the wiki it says that it was fredbear! IDK I'm confused.. So, that's kinda what i'm thinking now….

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

WilliamWP wrote:

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

I think it was Old Foxy. After all, his mouth is open. Also, I've heard that the victim of the bite was the guard for the first game. Apparently, the second game character is the murderer (Golden Freddy suit) which is why the animatronics (who the police are controlling), are trying to kill.

Actually, the Bite victim is the Child from FNAF 4

The tv says 1983, so it can't be the bite.

Don't make me go on again

I HAVE ANOTHER THING The springlock suits ((Fredbear and SpringBonnie/Springtrap)) were working fine then. In FNAF2, if that was the case, even if in a different restaurant, Jeremy would just have been given a springlock suit, because they would be working fine. Also, WHEN does Scott just say ‘Oh, yeah. This animatronic did this, sorry I didn’t show that earlier '???? SERIOUSLY? XD

No he wouldn't, because he is in another location with no relation to the springlock location. And again, I didn't ever say that Scott outright says “its the bite of 87” or Scott has to outright say it. I never said anything about that…

I mean, show it. I mean, it's too….. OBVIOUS to be the bite of 87. It's just… right there….. It doesn't make sense. Also, in FNAF3, Phone Guy says that there was an unfortunate incident in a sister location, meaning most or all of the locations had the springlock suits. Also, what other reason would have the first restaurant been left to rot? Also, when the kid's head is bitten, that was the child's head being CRUSHED, not really bitten.

Scott outright said the characters were haunted in a comment and outright showed the Puppet putting the kids' souls in the animatronics. Not everything has to be NOT obvious. Most, you literally just said it. And we don't really know about the withered location, so that's why. Finally, bite and crush aren't any different in this situation. They just CALLED it the bite of 87.

YOU KNOW WHAT, why don't you just GO to the website, and try asking. REALLY. Saying it's haunted is exactly specific (Haunted by what?) and is VERY obvious anyways. With the Marionette, it's most likely the kids from the Missing Children Incident, but what if it's something different somehow? Also, thats saying that the events from the minigames with Purple/Pink Guy in them happen at the SAME TIME as FNAF2, as Purple Guy is in FNAF4, even if only as an Easter Egg.

Why the harshness? I could literally say the same thing to you, so it isn't really a counter. My point was not everything isn't obvious. (His name is the Puppet) The Puppet minigame shows the original 5 kids being put into the animatronics. And why can't Purple Guy be at two locations?

The puppet is also called the Marionette, which is proven by his Nightmare form name being Nightmarionette/Nightmarione. Also, I'm starting to get upset XD (( Which should be expected from a girl with anger issues LOL )). Also, I don't see why he would, as he would have to travel a lot, as I doubt the locations would be that near each other.

Okay, just don't get where the anger came from. In fnaf 3 he is called “Phantom Puppet”. The name “Puppet” is canon because Nightmarione is in the non-canon Halloween update. This might be a stretch, but we don't really know if Purple Guy works at fnaf 2.

It's possible he (Purple Guy) owned the first restaurant. Also, the name is still canon technically XD Even if the character isn't. And the anger is just frustration.

VixenMangleTheFox wrote:

Forestwave wrote:

What I don't get is why his name is Purple Guy? And the locations would have to be pretty far away….
But in the wiki it says that it was fredbear! IDK I'm confused.. So, that's kinda what i'm thinking now….

The Wiki is made by fans. You can't trust everything it says.

Nightwing412 wrote:

GamerWolf98 wrote:

MarvelRules22 wrote:

Animatronics distrust adults because of pink guy, think that all adults are like that. Like kids because mentally, they ARE still kids. They are trying to stop you, thinking your pink guy. They're trying to protect their ‘friends’ AKA fellow kids.

If the animatronics ‘are kids mentally’ as you say (meaning they're haunted by the kids?), they would not think all adults were bad, because they obviously would have had parents before, who would have obviously been adults, and I doubt their parents were as mean as the murderer…

Their memories could have been messed up. And they possibly don't know who it was. A person in a SUIT killed them, and thats what they would know. They wouldn't know if it was their parents, or another adult, or a night guard.

GamerWolf98 wrote:

creeperking55 wrote:

Nightwing412 wrote:

GamerWolf98 wrote:

lilredrose wrote:

GamerWolf98 wrote:

lilredrose wrote:

lilredrose wrote:

Ok so I just watched game theory and Scott was fallowing in on it and gave some clues and by how close they got. So far they said that due to the pictures of Scott and his family in the forth game and one with his two sons and since Scott is the voice actor for phone guy and in the forth game there are two brothers. So the crying boy in the forth game might be his son along with his brother with the foxy head on. So bla bla bla the reason they are there at Freddy's all the time is because their dad(Scott) works there. And there's a waste egg where it shows purple guy putting a suit on a employee. And the hint that Scott dropped was something like what is seen by a child may be interpreted in a different way. Or something like that sorry it's been a while. So I think once the crying child saw that he thought purple guy had been stuffing him into that suit and told his brother about it. And finally we get out side where a girl has toys of the toy animatronics but chicas beak is off just like in the game when she moves. So it's not that this happened in different time periods but that it happened in the same time but with sister locations. Also if you activate the TV Easter egg it says 1983 not 87 so as we all now know the bite was in 83 but in the first game it says 87. Now wait how can that be if phone guy says it WAS 1987? Well it might have to do with him not remembering it right and Made a mistake. So any way. Back to the bite of 83 since the brother and his friends caused the crying brother to be bit the brother is having regrets and nightmares after he goes to each location his dad works at and he now beloved that the animatronics stuff you into suits. And when something says the famous catchphrase ITS ME. It's the brother still being haunted by what he and his friends had done. and for the missing children. I think those where his friends but the last time he saw them was at Fredbears pizzeria with the purple guy. And he didn't see them again so his nightmares are saying that the purple guy killed them. So in conclusion all the games we played where actully a child's night mare and we are bing told about them in a way of a story. And that's what the box is concealing the story that we are being told with an ending we don't want to except. So what do you guys think?

Sorry for the spelling or word mistakes I was writing this on a phone.

sorta i'm just putting together what they covered in game theory which if you think about it. it kinda makes at least a tad bit of sense.

Wait… let me get this straight… you're saying that the FNAF games, FNAF 1, 2, 3, and 4 are all NIGHTMARES a kid had? Sorry it's just not clicking all the way yet…

Yes, it makes a lot of sense to me, it's just kind of a shock… 0_0
But wasn't there two bites?

It doesn't make any sense to me….. and there technically were.

Same, i'm not really getting it. ‘-’
But ya, Only two bites.

oh no, I don't get it at all… ‘_’ -gets up and walks to corner- I don't need to be here then.. ‘-’
( - Scratch on! - )
~Creeperking

Hahaha read it over a few times, SLOWLY. You may get it eventually.