Could we please have an exponents block? ( ) ^ ( )

illusionist

Could we please have an exponents block?

Right there in operators with the other math blocks:

( ) + ( )
( ) - ( )
( ) / ( )
( ) * ( )
( ) ^ ( ) <———

It can't take more than a few seconds to add, can't it?

Hardmath123

+1 This is totally worth it!

OrcaCat

+1

coinman

+1

Programmer_112

+1. Although I think there is a workaround.

Wes64

i made one

its not perfect but it works.

OrcaCat

Wes64 wrote:
i made one

its not perfect but it works.

It also isn't a reporter block

Is it possible to hack a reporter block?

bobbysq

OrcaCat wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
i made one

its not perfect but it works.
It also isn't a reporter block

Is it possible to hack a reporter block?

It used to be somewhat possible. Then it was fixed. You would just put %(something) in a variable but I forgot how it worked or if it did anything at all.

lunaluvgood

+1
but while you are at it, add a square root block.

lalala3

lunaluvgood wrote:
+1
but while you are at it, add a square root block.

There is already one in there.

ImagineIt

Wes64 wrote:
i made one

its not perfect but it works.

That doesn't work with negatives.

OrcaCat

lalala3 wrote:
lunaluvgood wrote:
+1
but while you are at it, add a square root block.
There is already one in there.

And if there wasn't, do (x)^(0.5)

veggieman001

Nothing is permanent.

Last edited by veggieman001 (July 17, 2013 01:05:08)

thebriculator

There is a workaround.
I'll try to express it without scratchblocks.

(10 ^ ) of (log(2) * (10))
where you're finding 2^10

Square roots: (and any roots)

(10 ^) of (log(8) / (3))
where you're finding the cube root of 8

obviously these do not work with exponents or roots of zero.

anyway I still +1 this block

Last edited by thebriculator (March 8, 2013 05:55:46)

IanSan5653

+100! This seems so simple, yet essential.

Last edited by IanSan5653 (March 9, 2013 17:02:55)

Wes64

OrcaCat wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
i made one

its not perfect but it works.
It also isn't a reporter block

it doesn't need to be

you still get the number you need.

OrcaCat

Wes64 wrote:
OrcaCat wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
i made one

its not perfect but it works.
It also isn't a reporter block
it doesn't need to be you still get the number you need.

Yeah, true.

But I still can't wait until custom reporters.

veggieman001

Nothing is permanent.

Last edited by veggieman001 (July 17, 2013 01:05:30)

OrcaCat

veggieman001 wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
i made one

its not perfect but it works.
That doesn't work with negatives.
That's because negative numbers don't have real square roots and Scratch doesn't support complex numbers.
Disregard this post, I thought you said the sqrt block didn't work with negatives (probably thought you were quoting the post above yours)

Yeah… I wasn't sure what the relationship of Natural Log and e was. But I thought it was something with square roots because of what you said.

Lol. I could've just done this.

Last edited by OrcaCat (March 10, 2013 01:48:06)

8solarplanets

( ( var ) ^ ( var ) )
PPPPPPPLLLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Discuss Scratch