An_Oreo_4_you wrote:

I just explained myself. NO. new scratchers don't understand half of anything. and most blocks are made for beginners. the

(loudness)
(video [ v] on [  v])

blocks.
I'm not even asking for a new block anymore, just and updated version of

(loudness)

I don't even think you're arguing because you dislike, the idea, I think you just can't let it go.

flamingenius wrote:

I support! Though you could you megaaputurkultra's wav file to list convertor.

An_Oreo_4_you wrote:

flamingenius wrote:

I support! Though you could you megaaputurkultra's wav file to list convertor.

wav to list, say what?

DaSpudLord wrote:

An_Oreo_4_you wrote:

I just explained myself. NO. new scratchers don't understand half of anything. and most blocks are made for beginners. the

(loudness)
(video [ v] on [  v])

blocks.
I'm not even asking for a new block anymore, just and updated version of

(loudness)

I don't even think you're arguing because you dislike, the idea, I think you just can't let it go.

Yu are half right- an idea shouldn't be rejected simply based on it's complexity. It's comparing the complexity to the added functionality. Unfortunately, this block will not add much functionality to scratch, making the added complexity and the work required by the ST to add the block just isn't worth it.

An_Oreo_4_you wrote:

DaSpudLord wrote:

An_Oreo_4_you wrote:

I just explained myself. NO. new scratchers don't understand half of anything. and most blocks are made for beginners. the

(loudness)
(video [ v] on [  v])

blocks.
I'm not even asking for a new block anymore, just and updated version of

(loudness)

I don't even think you're arguing because you dislike, the idea, I think you just can't let it go.

Yu are half right- an idea shouldn't be rejected simply based on it's complexity. It's comparing the complexity to the added functionality. Unfortunately, this block will not add much functionality to scratch, making the added complexity and the work required by the ST to add the block just isn't worth it.

I use a chromebook, so I can't download stuff like that.

1. The only workaround is to use the

   (loudness)

   block, which isn't perfect in that it picks up background noise, and will not work without a microphone.
   
2. It will add lots of functionality, lets see what I can list:
   A. Audio visualizers that would work with every song.
   B. Games that change their behavior depending on how loud or soft the soundtrack is.
   C. Probably some more.
   
3. The block
   

   set rotation style [ v]

   has a very limited purpose, and isn't used very much. If we can have it, why not a audio level block?
   

BookOwl wrote:

Support, and here are my reasons:

1. The only workaround is to use the

   (loudness)

   block, which isn't perfect in that it picks up background noise, and will not work without a microphone.
   
2. It will add lots of functionality, lets see what I can list:
   A. Audio visualizers that would work with every song.
   B. Games that change their behavior depending on how loud or soft the soundtrack is.
   C. Probably some more.
   
3. The block
   

   set rotation style [ v]

   has a very limited purpose, and isn't used very much. If we can have it, why not a audio level block?
   

BookOwl wrote:

Support, and here are my reasons:

1. The only workaround is to use the

   (loudness)

   block, which isn't perfect in that it picks up background noise, and will not work without a microphone.
   
2. It will add lots of functionality, lets see what I can list:
   A. Audio visualizers that would work with every song.
   B. Games that change their behavior depending on how loud or soft the soundtrack is.
   C. Probably some more.
   
3. The block
   

   set rotation style [ v]

   has a very limited purpose, and isn't used very much. If we can have it, why not a audio level block?
   

julianandwill wrote:

BookOwl wrote:

Support, and here are my reasons:

1. The only workaround is to use the

   (loudness)

   block, which isn't perfect in that it picks up background noise, and will not work without a microphone.
   
2. It will add lots of functionality, lets see what I can list:
   A. Audio visualizers that would work with every song.
   B. Games that change their behavior depending on how loud or soft the soundtrack is.
   C. Probably some more.
   
3. The block
   

   set rotation style [ v]

   has a very limited purpose, and isn't used very much. If we can have it, why not a audio level block?
   

WHat u talking about? The rotation style block is very useful! My game would not work without it!>

Zekrom01 wrote:

julianandwill wrote:

BookOwl wrote:

Support, and here are my reasons:

1. The only workaround is to use the

   (loudness)

   block, which isn't perfect in that it picks up background noise, and will not work without a microphone.
   
2. It will add lots of functionality, lets see what I can list:
   A. Audio visualizers that would work with every song.
   B. Games that change their behavior depending on how loud or soft the soundtrack is.
   C. Probably some more.
   
3. The block
   

   set rotation style [ v]

   has a very limited purpose, and isn't used very much. If we can have it, why not a audio level block?
   

WHat u talking about? The rotation style block is very useful! My game would not work without it!>

Agreed here

An_Oreo_4_you wrote:

Zekrom01 wrote:

julianandwill wrote:

BookOwl wrote:

Support, and here are my reasons:

1. The only workaround is to use the

   (loudness)

   block, which isn't perfect in that it picks up background noise, and will not work without a microphone.
   
2. It will add lots of functionality, lets see what I can list:
   A. Audio visualizers that would work with every song.
   B. Games that change their behavior depending on how loud or soft the soundtrack is.
   C. Probably some more.
   
3. The block
   

   set rotation style [ v]

   has a very limited purpose, and isn't used very much. If we can have it, why not a audio level block?
   

WHat u talking about? The rotation style block is very useful! My game would not work without it!>

Agreed here

yes, we all love the roatation style block. but that's not the point here.

Zekrom01 wrote:

An_Oreo_4_you wrote:

Zekrom01 wrote:

julianandwill wrote:

BookOwl wrote:

Support, and here are my reasons:

1. The only workaround is to use the

   (loudness)

   block, which isn't perfect in that it picks up background noise, and will not work without a microphone.
   
2. It will add lots of functionality, lets see what I can list:
   A. Audio visualizers that would work with every song.
   B. Games that change their behavior depending on how loud or soft the soundtrack is.
   C. Probably some more.
   
3. The block
   

   set rotation style [ v]

   has a very limited purpose, and isn't used very much. If we can have it, why not a audio level block?
   

WHat u talking about? The rotation style block is very useful! My game would not work without it!>

Agreed here

yes, we all love the roatation style block. but that's not the point here.

No. He's saying that the rotation block is useful, but the block your suggesting, well, sort of the opposite.

move () steps

tucker206 wrote:

move () steps

Scratch