[scratchblocks] OFFICIAL testing topic

jvvg

Somebody has to make this.

Use this topic to test out the [scratchblocks] tag on the forums!

Please do not repeatedly spam this thread or try to make ongoing stories, though. Once you are familiar with the plugin, please stop posting here.

If you want to convert a script in a project, please use blob8108's converter.

Note from Paddle2See below

For more information on the Scratchblocks formatting syntax, see the topic in the Wiki

Last edited by jvvg (May 5, 2015 15:59:54)

blob8108

Don't forget to mention the test page, too!

(The link for my converter should be […]scratchblocks2/generator/).

EDIT: Also, typo:

jvvg wrote:
Use this tag

Last edited by blob8108 (June 29, 2015 07:42:10)

Williamja

wait (1) secs

Woah that worked!

Last edited by Williamja (Aug. 30, 2013 21:55:16)

ProdigyZeta7

This should be stickied!

define first post [post text]
say (join [w00t!  First post!](post text))
set [my post time v] to (time)
if <((my post time) - (last post time)) < (30)>
  say (join (join [Edit:  D'aww, ninja'd by ]((my post time) - (last post time)))[ seconds. :(])
end
set [last post time v] to (time)

Edit: Daww, ninja'd :<

Edit2: Woot! Stickied!

Last edited by ProdigyZeta7 (Aug. 30, 2013 23:52:32)

Williamja

When flag clicked
say [Williamja rocks!] for (2.5) secs
stop [all v]

Wow this tag is fun I'm gonna put it in my signature!

Last edited by Williamja (Aug. 30, 2013 21:57:36)

jvvg

blob8108 wrote:
Don't forget to mention the test page, too! (The link for my converter should be […]scratchblocks2/generator/).

EDIT: Also, typo:
jvvg wrote:
Use this tag

Fixed the link and typo.

cobraguy

Here's a block testing topic made back in February. Which one should be used?

jvvg

cobraguy wrote:
Here's a block testing topic made back in February. Which one should be used?

Oh, I missed that.

Since nobody appears to have used the old one and it was made before we actually had the tag, I think this one. However, I've reported this topic and will let the Scratch Team decide.

cobraguy

jvvg wrote:
cobraguy wrote:
Here's a block testing topic made back in February. Which one should be used?
Oh, I missed that.

Since nobody appears to have used the old one and it was made before we actually had the tag, I think this one. However, I've reported this topic and will let the Scratch Team decide.

Now that scratch blocks are back, people are starting to use it.

7734f

Yes, scratchblocks!

Hm….

When gf clicked
forever
 if <this is true>?
  say [I like pie!]
 end
end

Let's see if this works!

EDIT: Yes it did!

Last edited by 7734f (Aug. 30, 2013 22:47:21)

MathWizz

say [----->] for (repeat (10)) secs

blob8108

MathWizz wrote:

say [----->] for (repeat (10)) secs

Your point? As I've said many times (from the wiki):

The block plugin tries to match the code you write as closely as possible, and doesn't check you've used the correct syntax. The block text is only used to find the correct colour.

dracae

when gf clicked
forever
if <not <touching [Main v]>> then
point towards [Main v]
move (speed) steps

(EDIT: How do you make the boolean more prettiery?)

Last edited by dracae (Aug. 31, 2013 01:22:09)

ProdigyZeta7

dracae wrote:
(EDIT: How do you make the boolean more prettiery?)

Can't.

turkey3

define eat [food] in (seconds)
play sound [yum v]
wait (seconds) secs
say (join (join [That] (food)) [was delicious!])

define drive car
set [speed v] to (0)
turn motor on
play sound [vroom v]
forever
move (speed) steps
change [speed v] by (1)

forever
if <touching [pie v]> then
eat [pie] in (.00000000001)

Bug! Quote this. The forever if touching pie should be separate from the definition block.

Last edited by turkey3 (Aug. 31, 2013 01:28:14)

turkey3

ProdigyZeta7 wrote:
dracae wrote:
(EDIT: How do you make the boolean more prettiery?)
Can't.

I think they're going to do that. It's on the list of bugs.

dsaztur

when gf clicked
ask [Does scratchblocks work?]
if 
(answer) = [yes]
say [Hooray!]
else
say [What is there to say? Scratchblocks are there in 2.0!!!! Woohoo!]

BigBlueBlock

dsaztur wrote:

when gf clicked
ask [Does scratchblocks work?]
if 
(answer) = [yes]
say [Hooray!]
else
say [What is there to say? Scratchblocks are there in 2.0!!!! Woohoo!]

Correction

when gf clicked
ask [Does scratchblocks work?] and wait
if 
(answer) = [yes]
say [Hooray!]
else
say [What is there to say? Scratchblocks are there in 2.0!!!! Woohoo!]

dr3w8

add [SETUP] to [a random list v]
say (a random list)
stop [this script v]
when [#FF0000] clicked
say [The red square was clicked!] for (3) secs
think [But I don't remember a red square existing...] for (3) secs
say [I think this script will never run.] for (2) secs
if <(red square) = [existing]> then
say [A new menu button!] for (2) secs
else
say [I knew that square never existed.] for (3) secs
end

Last edited by dr3w8 (Aug. 31, 2013 13:01:57)

blob8108

turkey3 wrote:
ProdigyZeta7 wrote:
dracae wrote:
(EDIT: How do you make the boolean more prettiery?)
Can't.
I think they're going to do that. It's on the list of bugs.

It's actually really really difficult. If some CSS ninja can make angular booleans with borders and automatic vertical sizing using pure CSS (and JS, if you must), be my guest.

Last edited by blob8108 (Aug. 31, 2013 13:38:22)

Discuss Scratch