Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)

CakeAxxa

We have the function to make a small stage size or big. I need an bigger for some projects and it can be for others good.. 1920x1080 will be great but its a little to big? But i mean that ( you can use

go to x: (560) y: (623)

)

for figures. For a project from me it will be great. Using fullscreen is not the best idea.
Making Very big stage size

Edit: Idea with the scrolling is closed (its ok for the bigger script.. it can be useful but i think its better because scratchers will must re-adapt.)

Edit2

Please no more comments with ruin projects.

CakeAxxa wrote:
da-4th-account wrote:
No support. This could ruin other old projects.
nope
CakeAxxa wrote:
TheHockeyist wrote:
Indifferent. I can see why it might be helpful, but what if it breaks current projects? What would happen if you tried to change the size of the stage when editing the project?
you can change under edit. it wont will break nothing…

and

SCRATCH ZOOM FUNCTION not using chromes zoom or firefox…. opera…..

Last edited by CakeAxxa (Aug. 15, 2015 14:55:19)

SuperDoom

Please accept this golden text as my support.

ChocolatePi

Instead of a set bigger stage size, why not just be able to change the location of the stage?

CakeAxxa

SuperDoom wrote:
Please accept this golden text as my support.

ok

ChocolatePi wrote:
Instead of a set bigger stage size, why not just be able to change the location of the stage? :)

What do you mean? Cakeaxxa

Last edited by CakeAxxa (July 29, 2015 09:33:08)

goldfish678

CakeAxxa wrote:
ChocolatePi wrote:
Instead of a set bigger stage size, why not just be able to change the location of the stage? :)
What do you mean? Cakeaxxa

he means that you're able to drag the stage around so you can change the layout and differ the x and y limits of objects, although i can see that you just want a bigger stage

also please put [/color] tags down after you color something, it's really annoying when someone goes to quote you and has all their text in green

Last edited by goldfish678 (July 29, 2015 12:43:16)

TheHockeyist

Indifferent. I can see why it might be helpful, but what if it breaks current projects? What would happen if you tried to change the size of the stage when editing the project?

Blank1234

average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks

no support

CGRises

Scroll. No support. Period.

QuillzToxic

What about 1920x1080 crammed into a smaller space? or 4k?

CakeAxxa

CGRises wrote:
Scroll. No support. Period.

ok scroll… nope but a highe stage size

QuillzToxic wrote:
What about 1920x1080 crammed into a smaller space? or 4k?

ehh

Blank1234 wrote:
average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks

no support

ok but netbooks.. who use that..
and why zoom exist

TheHockeyist wrote:
Indifferent. I can see why it might be helpful, but what if it breaks current projects? What would happen if you tried to change the size of the stage when editing the project?

you can change under edit. it wont will break nothing…

goldfish678 wrote:
CakeAxxa wrote:
ChocolatePi wrote:
Instead of a set bigger stage size, why not just be able to change the location of the stage? :)
What do you mean? Cakeaxxa
he means that you're able to drag the stage around so you can change the layout and differ the x and y limits of objects, although i can see that you just want a bigger stage

also please put [/color] tags down after you color something, it's really annoying when someone goes to quote you and has all their text in green

aw ok But the scrolling will be an good idea but i think it is stupid too the long script is better i think and thx.

Thx to all comments…
-cakeaxxa

LattleKada

SuperDoom wrote:
Please accept this golden text as my support.

I agree, I support
:( I can only afford silver :(

Last edited by LattleKada (July 31, 2015 12:13:44)

CakeAxxa

LattleKada wrote:
SuperDoom wrote:
Please accept this golden text as my support.
I agree, I support
:( I can only afford silver :(

eh

Last edited by CakeAxxa (Aug. 1, 2015 09:31:03)

Blank1234

CakeAxxa wrote:
CGRises wrote:
Scroll. No support. Period.
ok scroll… nope but a highe stage size
QuillzToxic wrote:
What about 1920x1080 crammed into a smaller space? or 4k?
ehh
Blank1234 wrote:
average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks

no support
ok but netbooks.. who use that..
and why zoom exist
TheHockeyist wrote:
Indifferent. I can see why it might be helpful, but what if it breaks current projects? What would happen if you tried to change the size of the stage when editing the project?
you can change under edit. it wont will break nothing…
goldfish678 wrote:
CakeAxxa wrote:
ChocolatePi wrote:
Instead of a set bigger stage size, why not just be able to change the location of the stage? :)
What do you mean? Cakeaxxa
he means that you're able to drag the stage around so you can change the layout and differ the x and y limits of objects, although i can see that you just want a bigger stage

also please put [/color] tags down after you color something, it's really annoying when someone goes to quote you and has all their text in green
aw ok But the scrolling will be an good idea but i think it is stupid too the long script is better i think and thx.

Thx to all comments…
-cakeaxxa

netbooks are used by schools, as they are cheap computers

Znapi

I don't think allowing us to set the stage size is a good idea. In general, it is bad practice to rely on where your app(or webpage) is drawing to(a window, or, in scratch, the stage) to be a certain number of pixels wide and tall, because there are lots of different screen sizes/resolutions(some screens even have bigger or smaller pixels than others), like @Blank1234 is pointing out. Giving us control over stage size in Scratch would enforce this bad habit.

Instead, people make up coordinate systems to represent the space they are drawing to(like Scratch's 480x360 one), and scale everything to the size of the user's monitor/window/stage size.

If you want your project to be displayed at a higher resolution, you have use fullscreen and draw your costumes in vector, or draw them bigger in bitmap mode(2 times bigger?) and set the sprite size to 50% or something, depending on how much bigger your bitmaps are.

Last edited by Znapi (Aug. 2, 2015 01:34:06)

CakeAxxa

Blank1234 wrote:
CakeAxxa wrote:
CGRises wrote:
Scroll. No support. Period.
ok scroll… nope but a highe stage size
QuillzToxic wrote:
What about 1920x1080 crammed into a smaller space? or 4k?
ehh
Blank1234 wrote:
average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks

no support
ok but netbooks.. who use that..
and why zoom exist
TheHockeyist wrote:
Indifferent. I can see why it might be helpful, but what if it breaks current projects? What would happen if you tried to change the size of the stage when editing the project?
you can change under edit. it wont will break nothing…
goldfish678 wrote:
CakeAxxa wrote:
ChocolatePi wrote:
Instead of a set bigger stage size, why not just be able to change the location of the stage? :)
What do you mean? Cakeaxxa
he means that you're able to drag the stage around so you can change the layout and differ the x and y limits of objects, although i can see that you just want a bigger stage

also please put [/color] tags down after you color something, it's really annoying when someone goes to quote you and has all their text in green
aw ok But the scrolling will be an good idea but i think it is stupid too the long script is better i think and thx.

Thx to all comments…
-cakeaxxa
netbooks are used by schools, as they are cheap computers

So i am in a school too. in a gymnasium in germany.. we have computer rooms too but no net books.. only big computers with windows 7.

Znapi wrote:
I don't think allowing us to set the stage size is a good idea. In general, it is bad practice to rely on where your app(or webpage) is drawing to(a window, or, in scratch, the stage) to be a certain number of pixels wide and tall, because there are lots of different screen sizes/resolutions(some screens even have bigger or smaller pixels than others), like @Blank1234 is pointing out. Giving us control over stage size in Scratch would enforce this bad habit.

Instead, people make up coordinate systems to represent the space they are drawing to(like Scratch's 480x360 one), and scale everything to the size of the user's monitor/window/stage size.

If you want your project to be displayed at a higher resolution, you have use fullscreen and draw your costumes in vector, or draw them bigger in bitmap mode(2 times bigger?) and set the sprite size to 50% or something, depending on how much bigger your bitmaps are.

thank you for u long comment and i thinked its a bad idea.. (a little :(…) so what @blank1234 wrote with the netbooks… they dont must use them.. they can use the regular one. under edit you can change

TheHockeyist wrote:
Indifferent. I can see why it might be helpful, but what if it breaks current projects? What would happen if you tried to change the size of the stage when editing the project?
CakeAxxa wrote:
you can change under edit. it wont will break nothing…
thats what i wrote.

netbooks will use regulars and guys who have bigger screens can change under edit like the smaller one
- cakeaxxa

Nether_before

No support for reasons above.

Superdoggy

Blank1234 wrote:
average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks

no support

You could just zoom on your browser…

Superdoggy

Okay, total, 100% support.

If this came with “Screenwidth” and “Screenheight” values, then we could simply set the stage size to fullscreen. Also, with a bit of math, you can pretty much support every screen resolution.

To avoid breaking projects, the stage size should probably have a default at 480 by 360, which could be changed by a block.

CakeAxxa

Superdoggy wrote:
Blank1234 wrote:
average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks

no support
You could just zoom on your browser…

thats what i said XD

CakeAxxa wrote:
Blank1234 wrote:
average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks

no support
ok but netbooks.. who use that..
and why zoom exist

Superdoggy wrote:
Okay, total, 100% support.

If this came with “Screenwidth” and “Screenheight” values, then we could simply set the stage size to fullscreen. Also, with a bit of math, you can pretty much support every screen resolution.

To avoid breaking projects, the stage size should probably have a default at 480 by 360, which could be changed by a block.

ok but to not break it: you can change the default and to the bigger and smaller one. like i said. under edit. And thanks. (Netbooks dont should use the bigger)

Zekrom01

No support for the bigger size. Support for scrolling.

Discuss Scratch