chocolatepenguin wrote:

cheeseeater wrote:

We should create a studio for this, all the supporters join as a curators, then we can see who supports. Maybe we could make projects on why ‘ADD EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!’ are bad and are annoying and put them in our studio?

BTW: made an example of what most add everthing studios look like: http://scratch.mit.edu/studios/242305/ Maybe you could find a use for it?

Creating official studio now.

Cool!

EDIT: I'm a supporter!

turkey3 wrote:

I really wish the ST would see this (or at least post to know they did). I always feel like they never see the best topics

I'm sure that they have seen it- this has 100 posts now- I highly doubt a topic like this would go unnoticed. But it would be nice if someone actually responded- I do feel in a way that this topic hasn't achieved anything except gathering support for the idea, which is good but ultimately doesn't solve the problem. Perhaps they couldn't be bothered to read to huge mass of text! I wouldn't blame them in that case.

Aaaaaaandd…. I hate to admit it, but I actually preferred the last avatar! I'm just not sure if that's meant to be a nose or a mouth!

seanbobe wrote:

PhirripSyrrip wrote:

PhirripSyrrip wrote:

LeDerpy123 wrote:

I have a new statistic to report.
I did a Google Advanced Search and found that there are about 3,550 studios that contain the exact phrase, “add all projects”.
1,110 containing “add everything”.
213 containing “biggest gallery”.
33 containing “biggest studio”.
47,800 containing “add your projects”.
This adds up to 52,706 ae studios and counting!
BTW, this is the search term I used: “insert studio name here” site:scratch.mit.edu/studios

I'll quote this when I update the topic post. That is incredible.

You missed one: 11,700 containing “Add all your projects”

more than 1. 73,800,000 containing try to reach xxxxxx
73,816,346

Actually, there are only 44…

cheeseeater wrote:

We should create a studio for this, all the supporters join as a curators, then we can see who supports. Maybe we could make projects on why ‘ADD EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!’ are bad and are annoying and put them in our studio?

BTW: made an example of what most add everthing studios look like: http://scratch.mit.edu/studios/242305/ Maybe you could find a use for it?

I already made a project about it here: http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/11863220

PhirripSyrrip wrote:

turkey3 wrote:

I really wish the ST would see this (or at least post to know they did). I always feel like they never see the best topics

I'm sure that they have seen it- this has 100 posts now- I highly doubt a topic like this would go unnoticed. But it would be nice if someone actually responded- I do feel in a way that this topic hasn't achieved anything except gathering support for the idea, which is good but ultimately doesn't solve the problem. Perhaps they couldn't be bothered to read to huge mass of text! I wouldn't blame them in that case.

Aaaaaaandd…. I hate to admit it, but I actually preferred the last avatar! I'm just not sure if that's meant to be a nose or a mouth!

I'm actually going to change the avatar a little I thought this one seemed even more smiley, except now it looks like he doesn't have a clue what's going on and is daydreaming about lollipops or something

LeDerpy123 wrote:

I have a new statistic to report.
I did a Google Advanced Search and found that there are about 3,550 studios that contain the exact phrase, “add all projects”.
1,110 containing “add everything”.
213 containing “biggest gallery”.
33 containing “biggest studio”.
47,800 containing “add your projects”.
This adds up to 52,706 ae studios and counting!
BTW, this is the search term I used: “insert studio name here” site:scratch.mit.edu/studios

55,700

BigBlueBlock wrote:

LeDerpy123 wrote:

I have a new statistic to report.
I did a Google Advanced Search and found that there are about 3,550 studios that contain the exact phrase, “add all projects”.
1,110 containing “add everything”.
213 containing “biggest gallery”.
33 containing “biggest studio”.
47,800 containing “add your projects”.
This adds up to 52,706 ae studios and counting!
BTW, this is the search term I used: “insert studio name here” site:scratch.mit.edu/studios

55,700

In any case, way too many.

Support ;)

Here's something you should add to the “are add everything studios really a problem” section: (I got it fron the image someone else posted of a comment)

The team of an add everything studio are trying to get the number of projects in the studio as high as possible. One person may want to create projects themselves to help boost the number of the projects in the studio. These projects aren't really anything good, and it messes up the purpose of scratch: Imagine - Program - Share!

What kind of imagination does it take to just press the create button then upload it for the studio with no change?
Programming? Not really. You don't add a single block.
The person only shared it for a reason: To boost the number. It's a project that does nothing.

So that's it: The add everything studios destroy the purpose of scratch. I'm going to do some rough math here. If all of the add everything studios had their number of projects averaged, I would say it would be like 750. I've done the math, and I would say on average: That every project uploaded onto the scratch website appears in these add everything studios 12 times. Get the picture?

zorket wrote:

Here's something you should add to the “are add everything studios really a problem” section: (I got it fron the image someone else posted of a comment)

The team of an add everything studio are trying to get the number of projects in the studio as high as possible. One person may want to create projects themselves to help boost the number of the projects in the studio. These projects aren't really anything good, and it messes up the purpose of scratch: Imagine - Program - Share!

What kind of imagination does it take to just press the create button then upload it for the studio with no change?
Programming? Not really. You don't add a single block.
The person only shared it for a reason: To boost the number. It's a project that does nothing.

So that's it: The add everything studios destroy the purpose of scratch. I'm going to do some rough math here. If all of the add everything studios had their number of projects averaged, I would say it would be like 750. I've done the math, and I would say on average: That every project uploaded onto the scratch website appears in these add everything studios 12 times. Get the picture?

9000?!

chocolatepenguin wrote:

zorket wrote:

Here's something you should add to the “are add everything studios really a problem” section: (I got it fron the image someone else posted of a comment)

The team of an add everything studio are trying to get the number of projects in the studio as high as possible. One person may want to create projects themselves to help boost the number of the projects in the studio. These projects aren't really anything good, and it messes up the purpose of scratch: Imagine - Program - Share!

What kind of imagination does it take to just press the create button then upload it for the studio with no change?
Programming? Not really. You don't add a single block.
The person only shared it for a reason: To boost the number. It's a project that does nothing.

So that's it: The add everything studios destroy the purpose of scratch. I'm going to do some rough math here. If all of the add everything studios had their number of projects averaged, I would say it would be like 750. I've done the math, and I would say on average: That every project uploaded onto the scratch website appears in these add everything studios 12 times. Get the picture?

9000?!

…

Ok, the most important part is the bold part.

i like the last solution on #5.

when green flag clicked
if <[Scratch Team] = [Reading this]> then
say [Why are the scratchblocks still in the style of 2.0?]

+1 I agree. Unfortonatly, some of my projects are in the ADD EVERYTHING studios, and i don't have a choice of whether or not they are in it. As soon as the ST let users remove projects from studios, I'll tear my projects off the list for the “1,000,000 PROJECTS!!!!!”.

zorket wrote:

Here's something you should add to the “are add everything studios really a problem” section: (I got it fron the image someone else posted of a comment)

The team of an add everything studio are trying to get the number of projects in the studio as high as possible. One person may want to create projects themselves to help boost the number of the projects in the studio. These projects aren't really anything good, and it messes up the purpose of scratch: Imagine - Program - Share!

What kind of imagination does it take to just press the create button then upload it for the studio with no change?
Programming? Not really. You don't add a single block.
The person only shared it for a reason: To boost the number. It's a project that does nothing.

So that's it: The add everything studios destroy the purpose of scratch. I'm going to do some rough math here. If all of the add everything studios had their number of projects averaged, I would say it would be like 750. I've done the math, and I would say on average: That every project uploaded onto the scratch website appears in these add everything studios 12 times. Get the picture?

ouch!

Support.

BigBlueBlock wrote:

LeDerpy123 wrote:

I have a new statistic to report.
I did a Google Advanced Search and found that there are about 3,550 studios that contain the exact phrase, “add all projects”.
1,110 containing “add everything”.
213 containing “biggest gallery”.
33 containing “biggest studio”.
47,800 containing “add your projects”.
This adds up to 52,706 ae studios and counting!
BTW, this is the search term I used: “insert studio name here” site:scratch.mit.edu/studios

55,700

Forgot about the ones that have multiple titles that you searched.

WAAAAY too many still O_O

PhirripSyrrip wrote:

curiouscrab wrote:

When I try to search let's say "everything about [topic name]“ or ”everything [topic name]" the search results are a ton of add everything studios.

Supporters:
PhirripSyrrip
DotDash
dracae
turkey3
SuperNicky
ProdigyZeta7
BobStanley
numberonegamers
cheeseeater
StarscreamClone
krish15
mitchboy
LeDerpy123
blueservine
Firedrake969
jh1234l
Williamja
joshuaho
zorket
Failord
seanbobe
Wes64
FrozenFIsh13
lauraisawsome
Eintity
Flyboy
skeletonxf
chocolatepenguin
PH-zero
eaglgenes101
mario91100
Kenichi10
clubpenguin552222
GreenDog3
WeElites

You used my quote but didn't add me to the list of supporters. XD Could you add me to the list?

When I joined scratch,my computer was laggy every time I visited scratch Now, I think add everything studios make scratch even laggy

If the ST denies your ideas, maybe we could use reverse psychology. AKA Create millions of these studios and add projects to them.

You could also make it so that there's a limit to like, I dunno, 2,000 projects per studio or something.