rollercoasterfan wrote:

Nintenjoe10 wrote:

And how do you get the ACTUAL signature?

Go to discussion forums home, scroll down and click change your signature.

when green flag clicked
That is such a good idea
  I totally agree with it!  
play sound [Tell the scratch team about it idk why I'm putting this in a sound block XD v]

Prinseskat wrote:

Hmmm… this sounds great, but a Scratcher may get confused when trying to type in a number and finding it doesn't work, though I'm not sure how much that'd happen. Maybe there should be something somewhere saying what the min and max is? There is also a workaround, I'm pretty sure:

define number (n) min 0 max 5
if <(n) < [0]> then
   number (0) min 0 max 5
   stop [this script v]
end
if <(n) > [5]> then
   number (5) min 0 max 5
   stop [this script v]
end

define  block with (input capped)
if <<(input capped) < [max+1]> and <<(input capped) > [min-1]> >> then
    ...
end

seanbobe wrote:

define  block with (input capped)
if <<(input capped) < [max+1]> and <<(input capped) > [min-1]> >> then
    ...
end

Aboot4 wrote:

So, as most Scratchers are aware, you have the ability to set the minimum and max to a slider variable. This was a great feature that really opened up some opportunities for several Scratchers. Well, lately, I've found myself wanting this feature more and more: What if, in CUSTOM BLOCK NUMBER INPUTS, (Not variable sliders), you could set a minimum and max? Let me give an example: In

Do Blah for (Secs ::custom) ::hat custom

there is a number input:

 (Secs ::custom)

right? Well, in my suggestion, I say we should be able to right click

 (Secs ::custom)

and it will say
“Set input min/max”. Well, the Scratcher can click it, and a menu almost identical to the menu that pops up when you set a variable mix/max appears. If I set the minimum to 1, and the max to 5, it wouldn't let you input anything except 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. If I tried to type 6, it wouldn't work, JUST like it doesn't work when you try to type a letter (Besides e) into a number input on, let's say, the

Move () steps

block. You don't see

Move [lol] steps

anywhere. Anyway, support?? If not, WORKAROUND?!? I'd really appreciate it! Thanks!

Prinseskat wrote:

Hmmm… this sounds great, but a Scratcher may get confused when trying to type in a number and finding it doesn't work, though I'm not sure how much that'd happen. Maybe there should be something somewhere saying what the min and max is? There is also a workaround, I'm pretty sure:

define number (n) min 0 max 5
if <(n) < [0]> then
   number (0) min 0 max 5
   stop [this script v]
end
if <(n) > [5]> then
   number (5) min 0 max 5
   stop [this script v]
end

Pot-of-Gold wrote:

uh, i guess semi-support now, everyone else is support

Aboot4 wrote:

Prinseskat wrote:

Hmmm… this sounds great, but a Scratcher may get confused when trying to type in a number and finding it doesn't work, though I'm not sure how much that'd happen. Maybe there should be something somewhere saying what the min and max is? There is also a workaround, I'm pretty sure:

define number (n) min 0 max 5
if <(n) < [0]> then
   number (0) min 0 max 5
   stop [this script v]
end
if <(n) > [5]> then
   number (5) min 0 max 5
   stop [this script v]
end

Good point for the confusing thing, but couldn't you then say the same about mix/max for slide variables?

Sigton wrote:

Aboot4 wrote:

Prinseskat wrote:

Hmmm… this sounds great, but a Scratcher may get confused when trying to type in a number and finding it doesn't work, though I'm not sure how much that'd happen. Maybe there should be something somewhere saying what the min and max is? There is also a workaround, I'm pretty sure:

define number (n) min 0 max 5
if <(n) < [0]> then
   number (0) min 0 max 5
   stop [this script v]
end
if <(n) > [5]> then
   number (5) min 0 max 5
   stop [this script v]
end

Good point for the confusing thing, but couldn't you then say the same about mix/max for slide variables?

No, you couldn't say the same for slider variables because it shows you the limit (using the slider). But I do support this and it could be very helpful. Making scripts to check if a number is within a certain range is time consuming and an easy fix would be ideal.

Sigton

something (join [][111231231231]) :: custom

Blank1234 wrote:

i dont get the point
no support

+scratch doesn't have the current architecture to support this

and, couldn't someone just do this

something (join [][111231231231]) :: custom