There should be a

()≠()::boolean operators

block. It would pretty much just do

<<[] > [ ]> or <[] < [ ]>>

or

<not <[] = [ ]>>

But it's so annoying to keep making that. If they do end up doing it, it should be when they start running out of ideas.

Um, you can workaround this much more easily:

<not <[] = []>>

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

Um, you can workaround this much more easily:

<not <[] = []>>

No support as per above.
List all the reasons you'd like this block

This is a duplicate of: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/106232/
And there is a work around:

<not <[] = [ ]>>

support anyway.

Really_A wrote:

This is a duplicate of: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/106232/
And there is a work around:

<not <[] = [ ]>>

support anyway.

That topic doesn't seem to be there anymore - which means it was probably merged with another topic. The hunt continues!