MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

Rumanti wrote:

Like MAPU's nice example XD

Who's that?

*cough cough* xD

Superdoggy wrote:

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

Rumanti wrote:

Like MAPU's nice example XD

Who's that?

*cough cough* xD

Cough what? Still don't know who that is

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

Superdoggy wrote:

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

Rumanti wrote:

Like MAPU's nice example XD

Who's that?

*cough cough* xD

Cough what? Still don't know who that is

I may have made some invisible changes the first time around, I thought you'd notice when you quoted me. xD Oh well… it's a bit more obvious this time.

Superdoggy wrote:

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

Superdoggy wrote:

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

Rumanti wrote:

Like MAPU's nice example XD

Who's that?

*cough cough* xD

Cough what? Still don't know who that is

I may have made some invisible changes the first time around, I thought you'd notice when you quoted me. xD Oh well… it's a bit more obvious this time.

Haha xD

Whoopsey XD

Cool

blob8108 wrote:

We tried this once. We got up to a few tens of thousands of projects. It was back during the AT drama, so we even had a sentiment analyser that would detect “unhappy” or “happy” comments, and remove or add all of that user's projects, respectively.

The ST noticed. It added unnecessary bloat to their project–studio relation table! So we had to delete it. It was an interesting social experiment though

Hey! I heard of that studio and asked if I could curate it, and then I did something and the next time I saw the studio it was deleted, either I deleted the studio which is 0.000000000001% chance or it was a coincidence

Zaidhaan wrote:

either I deleted the studio which is 0.000000000001% chance or it was a coincidence

erryting? I'm pretty sure one of us deleted it manually.

Getting offtopic, closing.