ScratchSort

Your browser needs java to view projects. Click here to install Java.

user_icon Jens* shared it 1 year, 2 months ago
218 views, 1 tagger, 7 people love it, 1 remix by 1 person, 42 downloads, in 1 gallery
Add to my favorites?
Flag as inappropriate?

Comments

You need to be logged in to post comments

Add a Comment

 
hidas hidas 2 weeks, 2 days ago

pretty awesome! :)

scratchycat625625 scratchycat625625 2 months, 4 weeks ago

put it on turbo speed: it would do it in seconds(which it already does)!

AGXgames AGXgames 3 months, 1 week ago

Excuse me, paddle2see told me that you know how to hack scratch. Can you please tell me how?

Jens Jens* 3 months, 1 week ago

Why don't you just use the published source code? Scratch is not really locked down, so if you find a bug you'll be able to break into your Scratch image and modify it. However, this won't be fun because the sources you'll see will be incomplete (without comments and full variable names). So, since Scratch now is officially open source I'd go with the full code version :-)

(view all replies)
Nintendofan Nintendofan 8 months, 2 weeks ago

komisch, bei ScratchSort ist die liste hinterher gar nicht sortiert. ist das absicht?

Jens Jens* 8 months, 2 weeks ago

natürlich nicht ;-) ist aber ein Fehler im Java-Player, wenn Du das project in Scratch laufen lässt, funktioniert es richtig (das ist übrigens - leider - bei vielen Projekten mit Listen der Fall)

kiwi13 kiwi13 11 months, 1 week ago

Whoa! This is much faster than mine. (link to project)

DaCaMa DaCaMa 1 year, 1 month ago

ohh

inuwali inuwali 1 year, 2 months ago

Very cool! Thanks for your comment, by the way, about Repeat After Me... I have been MIA for a few months in the startup of school. I'll friend you on Facebook, promise. Have you considered Radix Sort? It's supposed to be very efficient for numbers since it only has to do n*log(m) passes, where m is the maximum of the number of digits in the numbers. Unless the numbers are quite long or the list is quite short, you should see an improvement over n*log(n) sorting that you get with Insertion Sort

Jens Jens* 1 year, 2 months ago

Thanks! I'm just now pretty occupied with other stuff than another sorting project, why don't you give radix sort a try, sounds like there could be some improvement there over my insertion sort variants.

JD_Wardrop JD_Wardrop 1 year, 2 months ago

sorry about the forums problem

gadgetman gadgetman 1 year, 2 months ago

(link to project) what do you think is this faster i added 2 more to my other version and it goes fast!

Cyclone103 Cyclone103 1 year, 2 months ago

Wow, much faster than the other one, and the algorithm is simpler too! Amazing! I am surprised to find, however, that in presentation mode, it actually runs slower than in edit mode, and edit mode runs slower than online. I guess online wins! Great project, loved & faved!

Jens Jens* 1 year, 2 months ago

I am surprised, too, that presentation mode runs a *lot* slower with list watchers than development mode, because usually it's the other way round.

Paddle2See Paddle2See* 1 year, 2 months ago

Very nice! That's pretty fast!

Jens Jens* 1 year, 2 months ago

It's an interesting algorithm I came up with while riding my bycicle to work the other day, gotta find out if somebody already published/named it before, lol!

chalkmarrow chalkmarrow 1 year, 2 months ago

Nice. That's getting to the speed that it could actually be useful in realtime.

Please Wait...