oshe10 wrote:

4 more projects to Arcade!

rodeboy1 wrote:

http://scratch.mit.edu/studios/270479/projects/

golden-scratch wrote:

Can I join somehow how do I join?

oshe10 wrote:

Birds <http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/13061301/>

“Protect the passing birds! Collect the falling power-ups, and destroy the falling obstacles by touching them. Beat the highscore! Get your name in the game!”

Game Design 9/10
Good, though i would like some instructions.

Originality 10/10
I have never seen a game like this before!

Difficulty Balance 3/5
An medium one .

Graphics 1/5
The graphics were simple . The texts should be made easy to read . Well, not a good one in graphics. (I think you were a bit harsh here. This category is how good the graphics were, not how simple they are. Probably should have scored higher. //I didn't do the graphics, so I can talk about them in a good light if I want to)

Sound 2/5
The music is vey annoying

Firing Round 6/10 (This is the addition of the following scores)
Reliability 1/2
0 (Very Glitchy) 1 (A few glitches) 2 (Hardly any glitches)
Game Length 1/2
0 (Too Short) 1 (Descent Length) 2 (Long lasting or endless)
Game Pace 1/2
0 (Very slow or too long for it's own sake) 1 (Quite engrossing) 2 (Very well paced and fun)
Replay Value 1/2
0 (Would never replay/ did not want to finish it the first time) 1 (Might replay) 2 (Too good to stop!)
Programming 2/2
0 (Simple to make) 1 (Fairly advanced) 2 (It was very complex)

Overall Experience 43/50
This game is a bit fast. I would have liked instructions and a tutorial

Total: 74 //You forgot this.

Key
0-19 I could have made that in my sleep!
20-39 Needs a lot of work.
40-59 An average project I suppose.
60-79 Quite a cool project. ———————> this one
80-94 Wow! It only needs a bit of tweaking.
95-100 You're the top cat!



P.S. i may have been too hard on this reviews, please tell me.

sonicfan12p wrote:

oshe10 wrote:

Birds <http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/13061301/>

//Both myself and Sonicfan12p have read your review

“Protect the passing birds! Collect the falling power-ups, and destroy the falling obstacles by touching them. Beat the highscore! Get your name in the game!”

Game Design 9/10
Good, though i would like some instructions. //You haven't described game design at all, this comes under Ease Of Use, which you deleted for some reason. Now the review is only out of 95?

Originality 10/10
I have never seen a game like this before!

EASE OF USE /5
Good, though I would like some instructions.

Difficulty Balance 3/5
An medium one . ///Doesn't that deserve higher points then? Surely if the game was too hard or too easy it would score less, but something in the middle would be just right. What made it lose these 2 points?

Graphics 1/5
The graphics were simple . The texts should be made easy to read . Well, not a good one in graphics. Sonicfan12p: (I think you were a bit harsh here. This category is how good the graphics were, not how simple they are. Probably should have scored higher. //I didn't do the graphics, so I can talk about them in a good light if I want to) ////Borrego6165: Whilst I give the reviewer the right to score a project in the way they see fit, 12p is right that simplicity is sometimes better. You haven't said what's bad about the simple graphics. Did you even mention how sharp the vector graphics look?

Sound 2/5
The music is vey annoying //Where did the 2 come from then?

Firing Round 6/10 (This is the addition of the following scores)
Reliability 1/2
0 (Very Glitchy) 1 (A few glitches) 2 (Hardly any glitches)
Game Length 1/2
0 (Too Short) 1 (Descent Length) 2 (Long lasting or endless)
Game Pace 1/2
0 (Very slow or too long for it's own sake) 1 (Quite engrossing) 2 (Very well paced and fun)
Replay Value 1/2
0 (Would never replay/ did not want to finish it the first time) 1 (Might replay) 2 (Too good to stop!)
Programming 2/2
0 (Simple to make) 1 (Fairly advanced) 2 (It was very complex)

Overall Experience 43/50
This game is a bit fast. //Mention this in difficulty balance! You just said “medium”, which is the complete opposite to this.
I would have liked instructions and a tutorial //Mention these in the deleted Ease Of Use

Total: 74 //You forgot this. ////Borrego6165: And it's out of 95

Key
0-19 I could have made that in my sleep!
20-39 Needs a lot of work.
40-59 An average project I suppose.
60-79 Quite a cool project. ———————> this one
80-94 Wow! It only needs a bit of tweaking.
95-100 You're the top cat!



P.S. i may have been too hard on this reviews, please tell me.